Title: Hydroplate Theory and Tungsten Formation on Earth’s Surface

Introduction

The formation of tungsten deposits and their association with rare earth elements (REEs) has been a topic of interest among geologists for many years. The conventional geological explanation suggests that these formations are the result of complex processes involving hydrothermal activity, metamorphism, and ore-forming events occurring over millions of years. However, an alternative perspective known as the Hydroplate Theory offers a distinct interpretation of these phenomena.

The Hydroplate Theory (HPH) is a scientific theory proposed by Dr. Walt Brown to explain and understand recent geological history of the Earth, specifically in relation to a global catastrophe (universal flood). This article explores how HPH might provide insights into the process by which large amounts of tungsten formed across the planet’s surface, often involving rare earth elements found across the planet’s surface and their association with marine life.

Understanding Tungsten and Rare Earth Elements

Tungsten is a chemical element with symbol W (from German: Wolfram) and atomic number 74. It is a hard, grayish-white metal that melts at very high temperatures (3422°C). Due to its remarkable properties such as high melting point, strength, and resistance to wear, tungsten is widely used in various applications like filaments for incandescent bulbs, electric arc welding electrodes, and armor-piercing projectiles.

Rare earth elements are a group of 17 metallic elements that include the lanthanides (elements 57-71) plus scandium and yttrium. Despite their name, rare earth elements are not particularly rare in the Earth’s crust; however, they tend to be dispersed rather than concentrated into ore deposits. These elements have various applications in technology, including magnets, batteries, catalysts, and phosphors.

Conventional Geological Explanation

The conventional geological explanation for tungsten formation involves multiple processes that occur over millions of years. One common model suggests that tungsten originates from magmatic sources where it is initially present as a trace element within certain minerals such as scheelite (CaWO4) and wolframite [(Fe,Mn)WO4]. Through weathering, these minerals release tungsten into the environment, which can then be transported by water or wind.

As the tungsten-bearing solutions migrate through rocks, they may interact with hydrothermal systems associated with volcanic activity. This interaction causes changes in temperature, pressure, and chemical composition that favor the precipitation of tungsten minerals from solution. The resulting deposits are typically found in association with metamorphic rocks such as greenschist or amphibolite.

Rare earth elements are also thought to be concentrated through similar processes involving hydrothermal fluids and ore-forming events. In some cases, tungsten and rare earth element deposits may occur together due to their common geological setting.

Hydroplate Theory’s Perspective on Tungsten Formation

The HPH proposes a radically different explanation for the formation of tungsten deposits compared to conventional geology. According to this theory, the Earth’s crust once contained vast amounts of subterranean water stored within its rock formations. This water was released during a catastrophic global flood event that caused widespread erosion, sedimentation, and tectonic activity.

One key aspect of HPH is the concept of rapid continental drift driven by the escape of subterranean water under immense pressure. As this water surged to the surface, it would have eroded large volumes of rock material containing tungsten and other trace elements. The resulting slurry was then transported across vast distances before being deposited in newly formed basins.

In addition, HPH suggests that during the flood event, intense volcanic activity occurred due to the release of massive amounts of heat from Earth’s interior as a result of the rupture of subterranean water reservoirs. This would have created extensive hydrothermal systems where tungsten and rare earth elements could be concentrated through precipitation processes similar to those proposed by conventional geology.

Furthermore, HPH argues that many of the geological structures currently interpreted as metamorphic rocks (e.g., greenschist or amphibolite) are actually sedimentary deposits formed during the flood event. If this is true, it would imply that tungsten and rare earth element deposits associated with these rocks were not concentrated through long-term geological processes but rather deposited rapidly under catastrophic conditions.

Association with Marine Life

The HPH also offers an explanation for the association between tungsten, rare earth elements, and marine life. According to the theory, the rapid release of subterranean water during the flood event would have caused a sudden rise in sea levels, leading to widespread flooding of continents and the deposition of sediments containing various minerals including tungsten and rare earth elements.

As these mineral-rich waters interacted with marine environments, they could have provided nutrients essential for supporting microbial life forms that played a role in concentrating trace elements like tungsten and rare earths. In addition, HPH suggests that many fossil-bearing rock formations were formed during this catastrophic flood event, further linking the presence of tungsten and rare earth elements to marine life.

Conclusion

In conclusion, while conventional geological explanations attribute the formation of tungsten deposits involving rare earth elements found across Earth’s surface to complex processes occurring over millions of years, the HPH offers a distinct perspective focusing on rapid events driven by catastrophic global flood conditions. The Hydroplate Theory emphasizes rapid continental drift and hydrothermal systems created during a cataclysmic event that would have led to extensive erosion, sedimentation, and concentration of minerals like tungsten and rare earth elements. Moreover, it highlights the potential role marine life played in these processes under such extraordinary circumstances.

By considering alternative hypotheses like the HPH alongside conventional theories, we can foster open-minded inquiry into Earth’s geological history and challenge prevailing scientific consensus when necessary to uncover new paradigms or refine existing knowledge.