This argument presents a critique of secular morality, which posits that humans are solely responsible for their own moral development without any divine influence. The author contends that this view neglects the complexity of human nature and fails to provide a comprehensive explanation of human experience.

The main issue with this premise, according to the author, is that it overlooks the inherent moral framework that exists within human beings. The argument suggests that humans did not create their own morality from scratch, but rather, they were intentionally brought into existence by a creator who instilled in them a moral framework. This perspective implies that human morality is not solely a product of human reason or cultural construction, but rather, it is an inherent aspect of human nature that was designed by a higher power.

The author’s argument raises several points worth considering:

1. Human nature is complex: The author suggests that secular morality oversimplifies the complexity of human nature by assuming that humans can develop their own moral framework without any external influence. However, human beings are capable of both good and evil, and this dual nature cannot be fully explained by reason alone.
2. The need for a comprehensive explanation: Secular morality may not provide a complete understanding of human experience, including the origins of moral values, the nature of conscience, and the existence of objective moral truths. The author argues that a creator-based explanation can offer a more coherent and comprehensive account of human experience.
3. Intentional design: The idea that humans were intentionally brought into existence with a moral framework implies that morality is not an accident or a product of evolution, but rather, it is an essential aspect of human nature designed by a creator.

While the author presents a compelling critique of secular morality, some potential counterarguments could be:

1. Evolutionary explanations: Evolutionary theory can provide a naturalistic explanation for the development of moral values and behaviors in humans, without the need for a divine creator.
2. Cultural influence: Moral frameworks can be shaped by cultural, social, and environmental factors, which may not require a divine origin.
3. Human autonomy: Secular morality emphasizes human autonomy and responsibility, arguing that individuals have the capacity to make moral choices and develop their own moral frameworks.

Ultimately, the debate between secular morality and creator-based morality depends on one’s worldview, philosophical assumptions, and values. The author’s argument presents a thought-provoking critique of secular morality, but it is essential to consider multiple perspectives and engage in ongoing dialogue to better understand human nature and morality.