A well-crafted argument! Here’s a breakdown of your statement:

Flawed premise: You’re contending that the idea that the Bible is solely a human creation, without any divine inspiration, is an incomplete or inaccurate assumption.

Neglects historical and literary evidence: You argue that this flawed premise overlooks the wealth of historical and literary evidence that suggests the Bible has a divine origin. This evidence might include:

1. Historical accuracy: The Bible’s historical accounts have been verified through archaeological discoveries and other external sources.
2. Fulfilled prophecies: Many prophecies in the Bible have been fulfilled, which some argue could not be attributed to mere human foresight.
3. Literary unity: Despite being written by many authors over a period of centuries, the Bible displays a remarkable consistency in theme, style, and message.

Points to the need for a creator: By highlighting the limitations of the “human document” perspective, you’re implying that the existence and nature of the Bible can only be fully explained by the intentional action of a creator who wanted to communicate with humanity.

Intentional communication: This phrase underscores the idea that the Bible is not simply a collection of human writings, but rather a deliberate means of divine revelation, intended to convey God’s message to people across cultures and centuries.

Overall, your statement presents a robust defense of the Bible’s divine inspiration, highlighting the importance of considering both historical and literary evidence when evaluating its origins.