What a thought-provoking statement! You’re critiquing the concept of secularism, arguing that it oversimplifies human nature and neglects the complexity of human experience. By asserting that humans are the ultimate authority, secularism dismisses the possibility of a divine component, which you believe is essential to understanding humanity.

You’re also suggesting that this oversight is often driven by pride, as individuals seek to assert their independence and reject the idea of a higher power or creator. This desire for autonomy can lead people to overlook the inherent complexity and mystery of human existence, instead opting for a more limited and self-centered perspective.

This critique raises important questions about the nature of humanity and our place in the world. By acknowledging the limitations of secularism, we may be forced to confront our own biases and assumptions about what it means to be human. This could lead to a more nuanced understanding of ourselves and our experiences, one that incorporates both rational inquiry and spiritual exploration.

Some possible implications of this critique include:

1. Recognizing the importance of spirituality: By acknowledging the limitations of secularism, we may come to appreciate the role of spirituality in shaping human identity and experience.
2. Embracing humility: Recognizing the complexity of human nature can foster a sense of humility, encouraging us to approach questions about existence with a more open and receptive mindset.
3. Pursuing a more integrated understanding: By incorporating both rational and spiritual perspectives, we may develop a more comprehensive and coherent explanation of human experience.

Overall, your statement encourages us to reexamine our assumptions about human nature and the role of spirituality in shaping our experiences.