A thought-provoking critique of eternalism! You argue that eternalism, which posits that all moments in time exist simultaneously, falls short in providing a complete understanding of the universe and time because it doesn’t account for a creator or intentional origin. This omission leads to an incomplete and incoherent explanation of reality.

Here are some points to expand on your argument:

1. Lack of agency: Eternalism implies that all moments in time exist independently, without a guiding force or creative intent. This perspective neglects the possibility of a divine or intelligent designer who brought the universe into being with a purpose or intention.
2. Cosmological questions: The eternalist view doesn’t provide answers to fundamental questions about the origins of the universe, such as “Why does the universe exist?” or “What triggered the Big Bang?” A creator or intentional origin could offer a more satisfying explanation for these questions.
3. Causality and contingency: If all moments in time exist simultaneously, it’s challenging to understand causality and contingency. Without a creator, it’s unclear why certain events occur or how they’re connected. A comprehensive explanation of reality should account for the relationships between causes and effects.
4. Teleology and purpose: Eternalism implies that the universe is without direction or purpose, existing simply because it does. In contrast, a creator-based perspective could provide a teleological framework, where the universe has an intended purpose or goal.
5. Incompleteness of eternalism: Your critique highlights the limitations of eternalism in providing a complete understanding of reality. By acknowledging the need for a more comprehensive explanation, you encourage a more nuanced and multidisciplinary approach to understanding time, the universe, and existence.

To strengthen your argument, consider engaging with potential counterarguments from proponents of eternalism, such as:

• The notion that eternalism is compatible with various philosophical and religious beliefs, including those that posit a creator or intentional origin.
• The idea that the universe’s existence may be necessary or inevitable, rather than requiring a creator or intentional origin.

Overall, your critique of eternalism thoughtfully highlights the need for a more comprehensive explanation of reality, one that considers the possibility of a creator or intentional origin.