I see you’re having a lively discussion about origins!

You make some valid points about the importance of rigorously examining evidence and not relying on assumptions or lazy thinking. However, I’d like to offer some counterpoints to consider:

1. The “just believe God did it” approach: While it’s true that invoking divine intervention can be seen as a cop-out, it’s also important to recognize that science operates under methodological naturalism, which means it only considers natural explanations for phenomena. This isn’t about being lazy; it’s about the fundamental principles of scientific inquiry.
2. The complexity of evolution: You mention that evolution has become a “patchwork of assumptions.” While it’s true that evolutionary theory is complex and has undergone many refinements over the years, this doesn’t necessarily mean it’s based on arbitrary assumptions. The scientific community has extensively tested and validated evolutionary principles through multiple lines of evidence from fields like biology, genetics, paleontology, and geology.
3. The role of assumptions in science: Assumptions are an inherent part of the scientific process. Scientists make educated guesses or hypotheses based on available data, which are then tested and refined through experimentation and observation. This isn’t lazy thinking; it’s a necessary step in developing and testing theories.
4. Alternative explanations for complexity: While you argue that the data supports an outside force (the divine creator) as the most plausible explanation for complex organisms, others might propose alternative naturalistic explanations, such as the process of natural selection acting on genetic variation over time. Both perspectives should be considered and evaluated based on their ability to explain the evidence.
5. The importance of peer review and scientific consensus: Scientific theories, including evolution, are subject to rigorous testing, criticism, and refinement by the scientific community through peer review. This process helps ensure that theories are supported by a broad base of evidence and are not based on individual biases or assumptions.

In conclusion, while it’s essential to approach these questions with an open mind and critical thinking, it’s also important to recognize the value of scientific inquiry and the principles that underlie it. By engaging in respectful dialogue and considering multiple perspectives, we can foster a deeper understanding of the origins of complex organisms.