A profound and intriguing question!

Firstly, let’s clarify that the concept of infinite universes, also known as the multiverse hypothesis, is a scientific theory that suggests that there may be an infinite number of universes beyond our own. This idea is based on certain interpretations of cosmology, quantum mechanics, and theoretical physics.

Now, regarding the question of trust: Scientists who propose the multiverse hypothesis are not necessarily trying to avoid discussing moral implications. The primary motivation behind this theory is to explain various phenomena observed in our universe, such as the fine-tuning of physical constants or the existence of dark matter and dark energy.

While it’s true that the concept of infinite universes can lead to philosophical and metaphysical discussions about the nature of reality, morality, and human existence, these implications are not necessarily the primary focus of scientists working on this theory. Their primary goal is to understand the physical laws governing our universe, not to explore moral implications.

That being said, it’s important to acknowledge that some proponents of the multiverse hypothesis might be motivated by a desire to avoid discussing certain aspects of human existence, such as:

1. The anthropic principle: If we assume that our universe is just one of many, it could lead to questions about why our particular universe is so finely tuned for life. This raises concerns about the purpose or significance of human existence.
2. Cosmic context: The multiverse hypothesis might diminish the perceived importance of humanity’s existence within the grand scheme of the universe, potentially leading to existential crises or moral dilemmas.
3. Alternative explanations: By invoking an infinite number of universes, some scientists might be seen as sidestepping discussions about the role of chance, free will, or divine intervention in shaping our reality.

However, it’s essential to note that these concerns are not unique to the multiverse hypothesis and have been debated by philosophers, theologians, and scientists throughout history. The scientific community is not trying to avoid moral implications; rather, they are focusing on understanding the natural world through empirical evidence and theoretical frameworks.

Ultimately, trust in scientists proposing the multiverse hypothesis should be based on their adherence to the scientific method, peer review, and open discussion of their findings. While it’s essential to consider the broader implications of such theories, we should not assume that scientists are motivated by a desire to avoid moral discussions.