A question that gets to the heart of the intersection of science, philosophy, and theology!

While it’s impossible to speak for every individual proponent of the multiverse hypothesis, I can provide some context and insights that might help address your question.

The multiverse hypothesis is a highly speculative idea in cosmology that suggests our universe is just one of many universes that exist in a vast multidimensional space. This concept has been debated among physicists, philosophers, and cosmologists for decades.

Some proponents of the multiverse hypothesis are genuinely interested in scientific inquiry, driven by curiosity about the nature of reality, the origins of the universe, and the fundamental laws of physics. They might argue that:

1. The multiverse provides a natural explanation: The existence of multiple universes could provide an explanation for the apparent fine-tuning of physical constants in our universe, which some argue is evidence for intelligent design.
2. Cosmological inflation predicts a multiverse: Certain models of cosmic inflation, such as eternal inflation, predict that our universe is just one bubble in an infinite multidimensional space, with an infinite number of universes existing simultaneously.
3. The multiverse is a testable hypothesis: Researchers are exploring ways to experimentally verify or falsify the multiverse hypothesis, using tools like gravitational wave observatories and high-energy particle colliders.

However, it’s also possible that some proponents of the multiverse hypothesis might be motivated by a desire to avoid discussing God or Intelligent Design. This could stem from:

1. Philosophical or ideological commitments: Some scientists may be driven by a philosophical or ideological commitment to naturalism or materialism, which can lead them to favor explanations that exclude supernatural or divine agency.
2. Fear of the implications of design: The concept of fine-tuning in our universe has led some to argue for Intelligent Design or a Designer. By proposing the multiverse hypothesis, scientists might be attempting to provide an alternative explanation that avoids these implications.
3. Avoidance of theological or philosophical debates: Discussing God or Intelligent Design can lead to complex, contentious debates that blur the lines between science and theology. Proponents of the multiverse hypothesis might prefer to focus on scientific inquiry rather than engaging in these broader discussions.

It’s essential to note that many proponents of the multiverse hypothesis are not motivated by a desire to avoid discussing God. They are simply exploring alternative explanations for observed phenomena, driven by scientific curiosity and a desire to understand the universe.

Ultimately, the motivations behind advocating for the multiverse hypothesis are likely diverse and complex, influenced by individual perspectives on science, philosophy, and theology. While some may be motivated by a desire to avoid discussing God, many others are genuinely interested in scientific inquiry and exploring the mysteries of the cosmos.