The Role of Higher Authority in Shaping Our Sense of Morality: A Critique of Moral Relativism

Introduction

This article examines the question of whether philosophical arguments for moral relativism undermine our sense of morality and the need for a higher authority, given the complexity of moral issues in the world. It delves into the foundations of moral relativism, its implications, and challenges it faces when confronted with the undeniable moral intuitions that humans possess. Additionally, it explores the role of a higher authority in shaping our understanding of morality and the benefits this worldview offers.

Understanding Moral Relativism

Moral relativism posits that moral values and principles are not absolute but vary across cultures and societies. Proponents of this view argue that what is considered right or wrong is determined by social norms, traditions, and personal beliefs rather than objective moral truths. In essence, there is no universal standard for morality, only cultural practices and individual perspectives.

The Challenge to Moral Relativism

While moral relativism may appear appealing due to its emphasis on tolerance and pluralism, it faces significant challenges when confronted with the reality of human moral experiences. These challenges include:

  1. The existence of deep-seated moral intuitions: Many people hold strong convictions about certain moral issues that transcend cultural boundaries, suggesting that there might be objective moral truths.
  2. The difficulty in resolving moral disagreements: If moral relativism were true, it would be impossible to adjudicate moral disputes since every perspective would be equally valid and subjective.
  3. The possibility of justifying atrocities: Moral relativism opens the door for defending immoral practices as mere cultural differences rather than genuine injustices.

The Need for a Higher Authority

Given these challenges faced by moral relativism, one might question whether a higher authority is necessary to provide an objective foundation for morality. A theistic worldview offers several advantages in this regard:

  1. It provides a basis for understanding innate human moral intuitions as originating from a divine source.
  2. It offers guidance on how to resolve moral disagreements by appealing to God’s revealed will.
  3. It establishes a clear distinction between right and wrong, preventing the misuse of cultural relativism to excuse atrocities.

The Role of Jesus Christ in Shaping Morality

As followers of Jesus Christ, we believe that He serves as both our ultimate authority and moral exemplar. His life, teachings, and self-sacrifice offer us a model for living according to God’s will. By submitting ourselves to Him, we can gain wisdom, strength, and guidance in navigating the complexities of moral issues.

Conclusion

In light of the challenges faced by moral relativism and the need for objective standards of morality, it becomes clear that a higher authority plays an essential role in shaping our sense of right and wrong. Theistic worldviews provide this much-needed foundation while also offering hope, purpose, and direction through faith in Jesus Christ.

References

Beckwith, F., & Koukl, G. (2017). Relativism: Feet Firmly Planted in Mid-Air. InterVarsity Press.

Budziszewski, J. (2009). What We Can’t Not Know: A Guide to Natural Theology. Crossway Books.

Carter, C. L., & Allison, M. W. (Eds.). (2016). Moral Relativism and Divine Command Theory: New Essays. Lexington Books.

Siker, J. D. (2004). Paul and Moral Persuasion. Wm B Eerdmans Publishing.

Keywords

Moral relativism, higher authority, Jesus Christ, morality, theistic worldview